<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>User related (chat) (new posts)</title>
		<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/c-2628318/user-related-chat</link>
		<description>Posts in the forum category &quot;User related (chat)&quot; - In case someone fails to not to be a dick in the chat.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:17:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-6607846#post-3887662</guid>
				<title>Discord: sepiafishie: Re: Discord: sepiafishie</title>
				<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-6607846/discord:sepiafishie#post-3887662</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 13:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Nederbird</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2854162</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Put together, the evidence clearly speaks in her disfavour. While I think that it is legitimate to compare the Western far right to Islamic extremist (which is pretty much the Mideastern far right), her implied allegations of others being nazi, and her condoning of unprovoked violence (as in, not being attacked first) against far-rightists, are clearly over the line and should have been acted upon earlier. Why it wasn't is beyond me, though I reckon that the matter was unceremoniously closed down after Spaces departed. That was wrong, as Spaces was evidently not the only offender. Sepia's offences effectively constitute libel and sedition under Swedish law, and I'd hazard to guess that also holds true for German and British law. That in itself, deserves a warning on its own right.</p> <p>The fact that she refuses to acknowledge opposing points is problematic in and of itself. However, since Rik's discussion with her happened off-server, and despite her acting like a dick in it, it's not severe enough for us to really do anything about it except take it as a warning sign.</p> <p>I myself demanded that sepia stop with that behaviour at the last instance, as it had become obvious that it was long overdue. There were no logs of warnings to her before, but I feel that that may indeed be in order soon. I logged mine action in the staff_log on the Discord server for those of you who are interested.</p> <p>While her slashfic gushing of CotBG-Sarkic characters can be annoying, I don't see that as enough to merit disciplinary action. Usually, she has done that when Sarkicism or CotBG has been discussed. As she posts no pics when doing that, thus not annoyingly taking up screen space, I would not regard the odd comment from her as shitposting. When it comes to cuttlefish, I really do not mind, on the contrary, I think it has a calming effect (cute animals always do), and there is definitely no need for disciplinary action on those grounds. Consider also that, lately, she has been posting far fewer cuttlefish pics, and has generally been far less active on the server, if you find the gushing and cuttlefish that annoying.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-6607846#post-3886642</guid>
				<title>Discord: sepiafishie: Re: Discord: sepiafishie</title>
				<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-6607846/discord:sepiafishie#post-3886642</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 17:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Dr_Grom</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2026083</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I agree that her behavior back then was inacceptable.</p> <p>Though since some time she focusses on cuttlefish and fem-CotBG, in which I see no direct rule breaking. Haven't seen her taking part in an argument since (or I missed it). It is discussable though if that constant fem-CotBG commenting, especially on totally unrelated topics, can be seen as rule-breaking shitposting. I have no problem with cuttlefish or other animals though.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-6607846#post-3886575</guid>
				<title>Discord: sepiafishie: Discord: sepiafishie</title>
				<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-6607846/discord:sepiafishie#post-3886575</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 15:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Rikjard Regreps</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2750540</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I announced it a while ago, here it is: Screenshots of the most egregious instances of sepiafishie being aggressive and someone whos behavior should have lead to administrative action a while ago.</p> <div class="collapsible-block"> <div class="collapsible-block-folded"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">Instances&nbsp;of&nbsp;sepiafishie&nbsp;insulting&nbsp;someone&nbsp;she&nbsp;disagreed&nbsp;with</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded" style="display:none"> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded-link"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">Close</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-content"> <p>Druing a discussion about wether or not the word &quot;trap&quot; was insulting (MIND YOU, that first, many of our members aren't native speakers and secondly, the discussion started because of a picture of a heterosexual, cisgendered man who dressed up as woman and the Admiral Ackbar-&quot;Its a trap!&quot;-meme afterwards), sepia called those who didnt exactly agree with wether it was offensive <em>in this instance</em> a dick. Twice.</p> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/insulting%20someone%20who%20disagrees%2001.png" alt="insulting%20someone%20who%20disagrees%2001.png" class="image" /></div> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/insulting%20someone%20who%20disagrees%2002.png" alt="insulting%20someone%20who%20disagrees%2002.png" class="image" /></div> <p>With this the discussion excalated even more, resulting in one of our staff members, Zero Strider, leaving and as of yet not returning.</p> </div> </div> </div> <div class="collapsible-block"> <div class="collapsible-block-folded"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">Comparing&nbsp;the&nbsp;Right&nbsp;to&nbsp;islamic&nbsp;extremism</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded" style="display:none"> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded-link"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">Close</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-content"> <p>No matter ones own position on the political spectrum, it is not okay to compare the right to actual terrorists.</p> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/comparing%20right%20wing%20to%20islamic%20extremism%2001.png" alt="comparing%20right%20wing%20to%20islamic%20extremism%2001.png" class="image" /></div> </div> </div> </div> <div class="collapsible-block"> <div class="collapsible-block-folded"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">Arguing&nbsp;that&nbsp;assault&nbsp;is&nbsp;self-defense</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded" style="display:none"> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded-link"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">Close</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-content"> <p>In thsi discussion sepiafishie argued that assaulting nazis is self-defense. It goes without saying, assaulting anyone can never be self-defense.</p> <p>Also in this discussion, she seems not to take the people shes discussing with serious.</p> <p>And also, she at one point argues that people who disagree with her only do so because they're not part of a group Nazis would threaten - which is arrogant and which I personally find insulting, especially since in this context I belong to the same &quot;group&quot;.</p> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/assault%20is%20self%20defense%2000.png" alt="assault%20is%20self%20defense%2000.png" class="image" /></div> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/assault%20is%20self%20defense%2001.png" alt="assault%20is%20self%20defense%2001.png" class="image" /></div> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/assault%20is%20self%20defense%2002.png" alt="assault%20is%20self%20defense%2002.png" class="image" /></div> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/aussault%20is%20self%20defense%2003.png" alt="aussault%20is%20self%20defense%2003.png" class="image" /></div> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/assault%20is%20self%20defense%2004.png" alt="assault%20is%20self%20defense%2004.png" class="image" /></div> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/assault%20is%20self%20defense%2005.png" alt="assault%20is%20self%20defense%2005.png" class="image" /></div> <p>As can be seen in the last screenshot, she invited people who wanted to continue the discussion to send her PMs. Following this the &quot;sockpuppeting&quot;-incident with another User (who was recently banned for that incident and other reasons) happened. Just to clarify: She invited people to message her, blocked one who did, and was then angry that he created another account to continue.</p> </div> </div> </div> <div class="collapsible-block"> <div class="collapsible-block-folded"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">My&nbsp;(Rik&nbsp;Regreps)&nbsp;own&nbsp;discussion&nbsp;with&nbsp;her</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded" style="display:none"> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded-link"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">Close</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-content"> <p>Because of her invitation to continue the discussion, I decided to message her after I saw the discussion. I will share the entire discussion per screenshots, and while it did not happen directly on the INT-server, I find it nevertheless important to consider. Especially since I have never written PMs with Sepiafishie before or after this, meaning that we really dont have any other relation than me being a staff member on the Discord and her being a user there.</p> <p>In this discussion Sepiafishie showed signs of not taking me serious, used scrrenshots (possibly memes?) that had the words &quot;you imbecile. you moron&quot; in them, and in the end felt unsettled because I simply wanted her to think again about her <em>arguing that assaulting anyone can be self-defense</em>.</p> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/PM-discussion%2001.png" alt="PM-discussion%2001.png" class="image" /></div> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/PM-discussion%2002.png" alt="PM-discussion%2002.png" class="image" /></div> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/PM-discussion%2003.png" alt="PM-discussion%2003.png" class="image" /></div> <p>Now that you have seen this discussion, here's another reason why I decided to shar the entire conversation. Sepia accused me of sockpuppeting as well during the previously mentioned &quot;sockpuppeting&quot;-incident. She wasn't sure if it was me or the other user who DM'd her, so she accused both of us. Mind you, neither had she banned me, nor had I during the discussion reacted aggressively or threatening at any point, yet she went to Grom (the admin of the german branch where I'm a staff-member, mind you) and said that she believes I'm sockpuppeting her.</p> </div> </div> </div> <div class="collapsible-block"> <div class="collapsible-block-folded"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">Accusing&nbsp;someone&nbsp;of&nbsp;being&nbsp;a&nbsp;nazi</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded" style="display:none"> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded-link"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">Close</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-content"> <p>I mean, its not explicit, but not exactly subtle either.</p> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/accusing%20someone%20of%20being%20a%20nazi.png" alt="accusing%20someone%20of%20being%20a%20nazi.png" class="image" /></div> </div> </div> </div> <p>I hope all of that shows that we should have an eye on sepiafishie and show her <strong>much</strong> less leniency the next time she violates rule #1. By which I mean at least a kick. It was demanded she stopped being aggressive/insulting multiple times already.</p> <p>Also, her constantly shitposting about being hot for cultists and cuttelfish has proven to annoy quite a number of our users. Anyone volunteers to tell her to tone that down?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-5976514#post-3806613</guid>
				<title>Chat: ConnieCommie#9265: Chat: ConnieCommie#9265</title>
				<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-5976514/chat:conniecommie-9265#post-3806613</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2018 13:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Afro Gufo</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>1713965</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>The user was permabanned after a series of misbehaviours across multiple SCP-related platforms, the last of which being what may be intended as a joke kind of advocating for Israeli mass murder.</p> <p>It is to be noted that this disciplinary action left several staff members dubious about the action itself and about our disciplinary rules, which are currently being revised.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-5957739#post-3802665</guid>
				<title>Chat:A Nigger Beater#774: Chat:A Nigger Beater#774</title>
				<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-5957739/chat:a-nigger-beater-774#post-3802665</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2018 21:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>DrMagnus</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>318209</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Kicked for obvious reasons.</p> <p>This is both their discord name + chat handle.</p> <p>Please escalate if they continue to rejoin.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-3785868#post-3768044</guid>
				<title>Chat: @SuperHankHill#2151: Re: Chat: @SuperHankHill#2151</title>
				<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-3785868/chat:superhankhill-2151#post-3768044</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 12:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>wanna-amigo</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2364809</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Unbanned.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-3785868#post-3760221</guid>
				<title>Chat: @SuperHankHill#2151: Re: Chat: @SuperHankHill#2151</title>
				<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-3785868/chat:superhankhill-2151#post-3760221</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2018 15:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Afro Gufo</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>1713965</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>User got banned today for slurs and shitposting. Ban will last 1 week; remove the 12th April 2018.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-3785868#post-3759302</guid>
				<title>Chat: @SuperHankHill#2151: Re: Chat: @SuperHankHill#2151</title>
				<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-3785868/chat:superhankhill-2151#post-3759302</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2018 18:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>wanna-amigo</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2364809</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>User got kicked today for posting random memes and general behaviour. Logs can be requested from me if needed.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-5494169#post-3743758</guid>
				<title>the toxic fox #7676: Re: the toxic fox #7676</title>
				<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-5494169/the-toxic-fox-7676#post-3743758</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>wanna-amigo</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2364809</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Unbanned.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-5494169#post-3739787</guid>
				<title>the toxic fox #7676: the toxic fox #7676</title>
				<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-5494169/the-toxic-fox-7676#post-3739787</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 21:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>wanna-amigo</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2364809</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>User joined to advertise their &quot;secrets of scp foundation&quot; discord. Grom asked them to put branch tag in their nick, then i wrote PM to them. Logs can be found below.</p> <div class="collapsible-block"> <div class="collapsible-block-folded"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">+&nbsp;show&nbsp;block</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded" style="display:none"> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded-link"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">–&nbsp;hide&nbsp;block</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-content"> <p>[21:46] wanna-amigo: Hi there, do you have a minute?<br /> [21:48] the toxic fox: yes<br /> [21:49] wanna-amigo: Just a quick question from SCP-INT staff member: how old are you, friend?<br /> [21:49] the toxic fox: <a href="https://discord.gg/XKfUJWT">https://discord.gg/XKfUJWT</a><br /> [21:50] the toxic fox: im 18 buddy<br /> [21:50] wanna-amigo: Doesn't look like it.<br /> [21:50] the toxic fox: i am fuck you<br /> [21:50] wanna-amigo: Why are you posting that server everywhere?<br /> [21:51] the toxic fox: so people can join my server my first server ever<br /> [21:51] the toxic fox: about scp foundation<br /> [21:52] wanna-amigo: And why are you ignoring the rules on SCP-INT?<br /> [21:54] wanna-amigo: &#8230; and now you are ignoring me.<br /> [21:54] wanna-amigo: That's your official warning friend. Further rule breaking will end in ban.<br /> [21:54] the toxic fox: i cant even text in SCP-INT<br /> [21:55] the toxic fox: what did i even do then<br /> [21:55] wanna-amigo: You just did that tho.<br /> [21:55] wanna-amigo:<br /> unknown<br /> unknown.png<br /> 259.36&#160;KB<br /> [21:55] the toxic fox: whats wrong with saying hi then<br /> [21:55] wanna-amigo:<br /> unknown<br /> unknown.png<br /> 288.83&#160;KB<br /> [21:55] wanna-amigo: And you ignored other Staff member.(edytowane)<br /> [21:56] the toxic fox: i ckecked on my server for stuff boi that why i ignored him boi<br /> [21:56] the toxic fox: i mean checked<br /> <strong>[21:57] wanna-amigo: Are you sure you are 18 y/o?</strong><br /> <strong>[21:57] the toxic fox: im fucking sure bitch</strong><br /> [21:58] the toxic fox: god why do people have to be so rude ugh<br /> [21:58] wanna-amigo: Wow.<br /> [21:58] the toxic fox: what :angry:<br /> [21:59] wanna-amigo: Well, i tried to be polite and nice to you.<br /> [21:59] wanna-amigo: And you just called me a bitch.<br /> [22:00] the toxic fox: sorry sometimes i get angry :disappointed_relieved:<br /> [22:00] wanna-amigo: Ok.<br /> [22:00] wanna-amigo:<br /> [21:55] the toxic fox: whats wrong with saying hi then<br /> [22:00] wanna-amigo: Let me answer by quoting your message first, and then rules, ok?<br /> [22:01] the toxic fox: ok thanks<br /> [22:01] wanna-amigo:<br /> [21:26] the toxic fox: hi</p> <p>Your message.<br /> - Add your branches tag to your nickname (see below)</p> <p>Rule.<br /> [22:02] the toxic fox: admin<br /> [22:02] wanna-amigo: I'm sorry?<br /> [22:02] the toxic fox: i do not know what you mean<br /> [22:02] wanna-amigo: Ok then.<br /> [22:03] wanna-amigo: Please show me where is your branch tag in your nickname.<br /> [22:03] the toxic fox: how i do that<br /> [22:03] wanna-amigo: Just paste it here.<br /> [22:03] wanna-amigo:<br /> [08:07] Dr. Grom - DE: */mɛkanə/<br /> [22:03] wanna-amigo: His branch tag is - DE.<br /> [22:04] wanna-amigo: [21:58] wanna-nana - PL<br /> Mine is - PL.<br /> [22:05] the toxic fox: chris-ox-xd<br /> [22:05] wanna-amigo: That's not suitable branch tag.<br /> [22:05] wanna-amigo:<br /> Branch tags:<br /> All users are required to add the language tag of the branch they are most active in or they want to be associated with to their Nickname (it is recommended to add it only to your server-nick). Users that are equally active in multiple branches may add more than one tag, e.g. DE/ND. This is about branch, not about nationality. The tags are as follows:<br /> English: EN Russian: RU<br /> Korean: KO Chinese: CN<br /> French: FR Polish: PL<br /> Spanish: ES Thai: TH<br /> Japanese: JP German: DE<br /> Italian: IT</p> Greek: GR Hebrew: HE<br /> Hungarian: HU Nordic: ND¹<br /> Dutch: NL Philippine: PH²<br /> Portuguese: PT Latin: LA<br /> Turkish: TR Taiwanese: TW³<br /> Ukrainian: UA Vietnamese: VN<br /> (edytowane)<br /> [22:06] wanna-amigo: Quote from rules.<br /> [22:06] the toxic fox: EN<br /> [22:06] wanna-amigo: Still. Where is it?<br /> [22:06] the toxic fox: chris-ox-EN<br /> [22:07] wanna-amigo: So. That's first rule which you broke.<br /> [22:07] wanna-amigo: Second was in PM with me.<br /> [22:07] the toxic fox: ok<br /> [22:07] wanna-amigo:<br /> <p>1. Don't be a dick!</p> <p>[21:57] the toxic fox: im fucking sure bitch<br /> [22:07] the toxic fox: ok<br /> [22:08] wanna-amigo: After i oficially warned you.<br /> [22:08] wanna-amigo: After trying to help you.<br /> [22:09] the toxic fox: i said im sorry ok :disappointed:<br /> [22:09] wanna-amigo: Yes, you said that.<br /> [22:09] the toxic fox: go on<br /> [22:10] wanna-amigo: So&#8230; how about we start all over?<br /> [22:10] the toxic fox: no<br /> [22:10] wanna-amigo: Ok.<br /> [22:10] the toxic fox: so am i ready<br /> [22:11] wanna-amigo: Then you are banned from SCP-INT for breaking the only rule, namely &quot;don't be a dick&quot; and for spam in multiplie channels. Ban will be removed in two days starting now.<br /> [22:12] the toxic fox: ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh<br /> [22:12] the toxic fox: fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuccccccccccccccccccccccckkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk<br /> [22:16] the toxic fox: nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo</p> </div> </div> </div> <p>Decided with 2 days ban (calling Staff a bitch after official warning imo warants &quot;go straight ahead two blocks&quot;). I just want to point out that it was kind of emergency ban, cause i'm more than sure that there will be trouble.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-5112791#post-3696005</guid>
				<title>Users: Gott Azzy, NOOBI, TheScientist: Re: Users: Gott Azzy, NOOBI, TheScientist</title>
				<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-5112791/users:gott-azzy-noobi-thescientist#post-3696005</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>wanna-amigo</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2364809</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Perma from me. But i will be fine with 3 years as well, but perma will be better.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-5112791#post-3695807</guid>
				<title>Users: Gott Azzy, NOOBI, TheScientist: Re: Users: Gott Azzy, NOOBI, TheScientist</title>
				<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-5112791/users:gott-azzy-noobi-thescientist#post-3695807</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 09:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Afro Gufo</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>1713965</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>3 years is the way to go.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-5112791#post-3695769</guid>
				<title>Users: Gott Azzy, NOOBI, TheScientist: Re: Users: Gott Azzy, NOOBI, TheScientist</title>
				<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-5112791/users:gott-azzy-noobi-thescientist#post-3695769</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Mafiew</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2035452</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Supporting.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-5112791#post-3695748</guid>
				<title>Users: Gott Azzy, NOOBI, TheScientist: Re: Users: Gott Azzy, NOOBI, TheScientist</title>
				<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-5112791/users:gott-azzy-noobi-thescientist#post-3695748</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 07:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>TPS-Geronam</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2863064</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>3 years, same as DE.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-5112791#post-3695747</guid>
				<title>Users: Gott Azzy, NOOBI, TheScientist: Users: Gott Azzy, NOOBI, TheScientist</title>
				<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-5112791/users:gott-azzy-noobi-thescientist#post-3695747</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 07:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Dr_Grom</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2026083</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>The users <tt>Gott Azzy@Gott Azzy#1516</tt> alias <tt>Gott Azzy der zweite#4149</tt>, <tt>@NOOBI#3101</tt> and <tt>TheScientist@GoF*ckYourself#5877</tt> alias <tt>FishyBishy#4940</tt> have been banned after the following incident:</p> <p>On the 25.01.2018 Azzy and Noobi have entered the INT's Discord and started trolling and being offensive to other users, especially certain German staff members. Both have been banned from DE's Discord after a similar incident in December. They were banned on INT and joined several other branches Discords to continue there, where they where banned immediately in most cases.</p> <p>There is proof that they where invited to the servers by TheScientist.<br /> He also seems to have a habit of choosing provoking nicknames (which got him a warning on DE the same day), like &quot;GoF*ckYourself&quot;, something with &quot;ACAB&quot; in it, &quot;Bolshewik!&quot;, &quot;SuicideIsHealthy&quot; (which triggered a panic attack in one of our users who is sensitive to that matter) etc.</p> <p>All three have been banned for 3 years on DE, as we do not think they are going to be mature enough for our community soon.</p> <p>How long should they be banned? To me it seems as if Azzy was the one who causes all the trouble while Noobi and Scientist do as he bids.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-4405340#post-3644513</guid>
				<title>Chat: JackEvereds#1812: Chat: JackEvereds#1812</title>
				<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-4405340/chat:jackevereds-1812#post-3644513</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2017 22:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>wanna-amigo</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2364809</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>We need to make seperate category for that topics&#8230;</p> <p>Anyway user was warned then kicked for disturbive and mean behavior, logs can be found here:</p> <p>Warning:</p> <div class="collapsible-block"> <div class="collapsible-block-folded"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">+&nbsp;show&nbsp;block</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded" style="display:none"> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded-link"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">–&nbsp;hide&nbsp;block</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-content"> <p>[21:02] ThePaperMask - DE: Guys i just found the best scp ever<br /> [21:02] ThePaperMask - DE: here is a little part of it:<br /> &quot;Two researchers wheel in a patient on a table.</p> <p>Dr. Baker: So this patient-</p> <p>SCP-049-J: (Sniff) -has the pestilence yes mmmmmmm I can smell it.&quot;<br /> [21:02] ThePaperMask - DE: Another one;<br /> &quot;Dr. Baker: (Pauses) …yes, well, we’ll get to that. First off, can you tell me your name?</p> <p>SCP-049-J: Yes hmm quite very well I have the cure good sir indubitably yes I am a doctor.</p> <p>Dr. Baker: …what?&quot;(edytowane)<br /> [21:02] Rikjard Regreps - DE: I thought that was more like pleasure through pain-thing, but not necessarily sexual @Nederbörd - EN(edytowane)<br /> [21:03] Minuteman - ES: PaAaaAAAaAAin -Ion<br /> [21:03] Dr. Spanko - EN: 049j isn<br /> [21:03] Dr. Spanko - EN: t funny<br /> [21:03] wanna-ping - PL: ^<br /> [21:03] ThePaperMask - DE: it IS<br /> [21:03] ThePaperMask - DE: :(<br /> [21:03] wanna-ping - PL: No, tell him cack<br /> [21:03] Dr. Spanko - EN: it's a bad parody of an already bad scp<br /> [21:03] cuttlefeffie - EN: ions canonically pretty much attracted to people whove wanted to kill him at some point. please help this man,<br /> [21:03] Dr. Spanko - EN: based on the &quot;plague doctor&quot; greentexts<br /> [21:04] Nederbörd - EN: Don't forget Lovataar and the taste of her, ahem, &quot;fermented honey&quot;. ;)<br /> [21:04] ThePaperMask - DE: &quot;SCP-049-J proceeds to gesture dramatically over the patient before violently beating the patient’s throat with a shoe.&quot;<br /> [21:04] cuttlefeffie - EN: :3c<br /> [21:04] Minuteman - ES: wut<br /> [21:04] Dr. Spanko - EN: OH MAN HE WHACKS HIM INSTEAD OF TREATING HIM OH MY<br /> [21:04] Dr. Spanko - EN: SO FUNNY NEVER SAW IT COMING<br /> [21:04] ThePaperMask - DE: &#8230;<br /> [21:04] ThePaperMask - DE: Oh wow, we have different opinions!<br /> <strong>[21:04] Dr. Spanko - EN: 049 is the single worst SCP on the site, and 049 is a circlejerking omage to it</strong><br /> [21:05] ThePaperMask - DE: i cant argue with 049 being bad<br /> [21:05] Nederbörd - EN: Oh come on, folks, don't hate on it. It's just some slapstick. Some people are into it, some people are not. No big deal.<br /> [21:07] wanna-ping - PL: SCP-049-J is just lame joke.<br /> [21:07] Nederbörd - EN: Meh, I don't think 049 is that bad. Unengaging, yeah, but I wouldn't call it outright bad.<br /> [21:07] Rikjard Regreps - DE: Wait. On here we had discussion about politics, religion and sexuality &#8230; and thee first time it goes into &quot;ITS BAD!&quot; - &quot;ITS NOT!&quot; is when talking about an SCP?<br /> [21:07] Rikjard Regreps - DE: Huh, weird XD<br /> [21:08] Nederbörd - EN: Hahaha! XD<br /> [21:08] Decibelle - EN: 049 is cheesy fun<br /> [21:08] Decibelle - EN: thats why i like it<br /> <strong>[21:08] wanna-ping - PL: &quot;normal&quot; is pretty ok for me. &quot;J&quot; is just bad.</strong><br /> [21:08] wanna-ping - PL: And i will be glad if somebody will point me where the joke is there.<br /> [21:08] Nederbörd - EN: Huh, yeah, that maybe it. I've noticed how some people are really into cheese.<br /> [21:09] Nederbörd - EN: Not a big fan of it myself though.<br /> [21:09] Rikjard Regreps - DE: Meh, I dont like cheese overall.<br /> [21:09] Rikjard Regreps - DE: Gouda? Yes. But the rest? Nah.<br /> [21:09] Minuteman - ES: Cheese Branch<br /> [21:09] Nederbörd - EN: I like Swedish Household Cheese.<br /> [21:09] wanna-ping - PL: Cheese?<br /> [21:10] Nederbörd - EN: It's mild, slightly acidic, and quite cheap. ^^<br /> [21:10] ThePaperMask - DE: Normal cheese is great but every weird thing (moldy cheese? Blue-moldy cheese? Smell-cheese? HOW ABOUT NO?)<br /> [21:10] Decibelle - EN: the joke is that its a hilariously incompetent plague doctor whos a fraud and their insanely bizarre cures are &quot;beating people to death&quot; or something equally odd<br /> [21:10] Nederbörd - EN: Great complement on sandwiches.<br /> <strong>[21:10] Dr. Spanko - EN: did you say the original was GOOD @wanna-ping - PL ?</strong><br /> [21:10] Decibelle - EN: and they have a really particular interesting way of talking thats memorable<br /> [21:10] wanna-ping - PL: For me that isnt funny joke.<br /> [21:11] Decibelle - EN: then thats fine<br /> <strong>[21:11] wanna-ping - PL: Yes, my dear bird. Im dare to say even more: I LIKE SCP-049.</strong><br /> [21:11] Rikjard Regreps - DE: Well, humor is a rather subjective thing, so its no surpise that many dont like it, while others do.<br /> [21:11] Nederbörd - EN: Hm, maybe. Doesn't really hook me, is all. I suppose it's just not my kinda humour.<br /> [21:11] wanna-ping - PL: And i dont feel that &quot;interesting way of talking&quot;. I guess it's just difference in cultures.<br /> <strong>[21:11] Dr. Spanko - EN: i'm actually a little mad at you</strong><br /> [21:12] Dr. Spanko - EN: what possible redeeming quality does 049 have<br /> [21:12] Rikjard Regreps - DE: Two words:<br /> [21:12] Pilz - EN: Come on Jack, it's not the worst.<br /> [21:12] Rikjard Regreps - DE:<br /> 1ngsgv.jpg<br /> 59.98&#160;KB<br /> [21:12] wanna-ping - PL: Maybe by itself its not the best scip.<br /> <strong>[21:12] Dr. Spanko - EN: it's literally THE WORST on the site</strong><br /> <strong>[21:12] Nederbörd - EN: @Dr. Spanko - EN It's okay to not like 049, but please, be civil about it.</strong><br /> <strong>[21:12] Dr. Spanko - EN: i'm civik</strong><br /> [21:12] Dr. Spanko - EN: civil*<br /> <strong>[21:13] wanna-ping - PL: 2521 is worse</strong><br /> [21:13] Dr. Spanko - EN: Absolute hogwash<br /> <strong>[21:13] wanna-ping - PL: 343</strong><br /> [21:13] ThePaperMask - DE: You have a different opinion than me? I am upset!!!!! ~ You, Spanko.<br /> <strong>[21:13] wanna-ping - PL: Guys, Spanko is civil and he is not upset.</strong><br /> [21:13] Rikjard Regreps - DE: Come on guys, if we start discussing which is the worst SCP we'll probably get between 20 and 200 different opinions.(edytowane)<br /> <strong>[21:14] Nederbörd - EN: Okay, so this is just a shtick you guys have?</strong><sup class="footnoteref"><a id="footnoteref-32153-1" href="javascript:;" class="footnoteref" >1</a></sup><br /> <strong>[21:14] Dr. Spanko - EN: 2521 is an interesting format screw. 343 is a first attempt at making god, which is an interesting concept and creates the dilemma of uncontainment</strong><br /> <strong>[21:14] wanna-ping - PL: And 049 is one of the first humanoid.</strong><br /> <strong>[21:14] Dr. Spanko - EN: and the worst written one</strong><br /> [21:14] Minuteman - ES: Ehem<br /> [21:14] wanna-ping - PL: And one of few scips from old times that makes sense.<br /> [21:15] Judas - FR: the best humanoid is 076<br /> [21:15] Dr. Spanko - EN: from old times you mean early wiki?<br /> [21:15] Rikjard Regreps - DE: @Dr. Spanko - EN The worst written? Try read some of the Decomissioned.(edytowane)<br /> [21:15] wanna-ping - PL: Yes.<br /> [21:15] Minuteman - ES: 343 uses the same writting style as 049<br /> [21:15] Dr. Spanko - EN: Those are decommed for a reason<br /> [21:15] Nederbörd - EN: The best early humanoid IMO is 096.<br /> [21:15] Minuteman - ES: 343 is god&#8230; and thats it<br /> [21:15] Dr. Spanko - EN: 076 is based off of stories from the bible, which is interesting<br /> [21:15] Dr. Spanko - EN: 049 has NO story<br /> [21:15] Dr. Spanko - EN: None<br /> [21:15] Nederbörd - EN: Creeped me out a lot the first time I read it.<br /> [21:16] wanna-ping - PL: Its based on plague doctors.<br /> [21:16] Dr. Spanko - EN: yeah<br /> [21:16] Dr. Spanko - EN: so what<br /> [21:16] Judas - FR: @Dr. Spanko - EN 076 is just a fucking edgelord<br /> [21:16] wanna-ping - PL: And it's just &quot;plague doctors but creepy, because instead of helping he kills&quot;.<br /> [21:16] Nederbörd - EN: And quackery gone too far.<br /> <strong>[21:16] Rikjard Regreps - DE: @Dr. Spanko - EN We get it. You dont like. You wont convince others, so can we please stop this bottomless discussion before a less civil argument breaks out?(edytowane)</strong><br /> [21:16] wanna-ping - PL: But i like that simplicity.<br /> [21:16] Dr. Spanko - EN: PLague doctors never helped<br /> [21:16] Dr. Spanko - EN: Never<br /> [21:16] Judas - FR: uhhhh&#8230; False ?<br /> [21:17] Dr. Spanko - EN: Absolutely incorrect<br /> [21:17] ThePaperMask - DE: wrONG<br /> [21:17] Judas - FR: But if you speak of PL doctors :v<br /> [21:17] Dr. Spanko - EN: They were tricksters, preying on the stupidity of the time to get money and giving fake cures<br /> [21:17] Minuteman - ES: W R O n G<br /> [21:17] ThePaperMask - DE: <a href="https://media.giphy.com/media/3oz8xLd9DJq2l2VFtu/giphy.gif">https://media.giphy.com/media/3oz8xLd9DJq2l2VFtu/giphy.gif</a><br /> [21:18] Dr. Spanko - EN: Alright, provide evidence I'm wrong<br /> [21:18] Judas - FR: @ThePaperMask - DE Fake news<br /> <strong>[21:18] Nederbörd - EN: @Dr. Spanko - EN @wanna-ping - PL Really folks, is this some sort of special thing you got going? Because from an outside perspective, this is starting to look pretty uncivil.(edytowane)</strong><br /> [21:18] Dr. Spanko - EN: Show me oone source that says medieval plague doctors actually helped cure the plague<br /> [21:18] ThePaperMask - DE: Well thats true<br /> [21:18] Minuteman - ES: 049 its bad because it doesn't have story and the plague doctors were bad<br /> <strong>[21:18] wanna-ping - PL: I just like to have discussion about scip, thats all.</strong><br /> <strong>[21:19] Rikjard Regreps - DE: But this discussion starts to go into ranting territory.(edytowane)</strong><br /> [21:19] Dr. Spanko - EN: It's also bad because of all the attention it gets, it's shit that would be deleted if posted today<br /> [21:19] wanna-ping - PL: it's shit that would be deleted if posted today<br /> Like 90% of old works.<br /> [21:19] Dr. Spanko - EN: If I could delete one scp from the site, it would be that<br /> [21:20] wanna-ping - PL: With 173, 343, 426 and 914 on top.<br /> [21:20] Rikjard Regreps - DE: @Dr. Spanko - EN Do it better, then. Ask if you can rework it, and make it better.<br /> [21:20] Dr. Spanko - EN: I'm not a good enough author, also it's heratige collection i think<br /> [21:20] Dr. Spanko - EN: which is even worse<br /> <strong>[21:20] Nederbörd - EN: It's one thing to discuss, it's another thing to just flat out say &quot;this sucks&quot; and &quot;its the worst&quot;. In mine experience, stuff like that is just bound to kick up a lot of fuss, hence why it's considered uncivil. At least where I hail from.</strong><br /> [21:20] Rikjard Regreps - DE: Also, older SCPs were often less refined &#8230; doesnt mean they're inherently worse. There are enough people who like them.<br /> <strong>[21:21] Rikjard Regreps - DE: Also, I agree completely with Neder.</strong><br /> [21:21] Nederbörd - EN: Then again, I'm from Sweden, and we're notoriously afraid of conflicts.<br /> <strong>[21:21] Dr. Spanko - EN: I vehemently despise that one</strong><br /> [21:21] Dr. Spanko - EN: because everyone just blindlessly says OH I GUESS BECAUSE IT WAS ONE OF THE FIRST IT'S COOL<br /> [21:22] Minuteman - ES: 682 only kills and can't be destroyed<br /> [21:22] wanna-ping - PL: As you can see here thats not the truth.<br /> <strong>[21:22] Rikjard Regreps - DE: @Dr. Spanko - EN You're entitled to your opinion, and you are free to discuss it in a civil manner. But now you're getting from &quot;IT SUCKS!&quot; to &quot;THOSE WHO LIKE IT SUCK!&quot;</strong><br /> [21:22] Rikjard Regreps - DE: At least thats what it sounds like to me.<br /> [21:22] Dr. Spanko - EN: I'd like anyone here to give a good reason it's acceptable<br /> [21:23] Rikjard Regreps - DE: Multiple people did. You disagreed.<br /> [21:23] Dr. Spanko - EN: yeah because they were wrong<br /> [21:23] Nederbörd - EN: Well yes, personally I think 682 is just bland and boring. I don't really get why it's that popular.<br /> [21:23] Minuteman - ES: :v<br /> [21:23] Judas - FR: 999 = best SCP :v<br /> [21:23] Minuteman - ES: W R O N G A G A I N F O L K S<br /> <strong>[21:23] Rikjard Regreps - DE: @Dr. Spanko - EN Thats not a civil thing to say.</strong><br /> [21:23] cuttlefeffie - EN: have we stopped fightin yet ;o;<br /> [21:23] Dr. Spanko - EN: Yeah but 682 has the air of lost of testing and seeing what the outcome is. It has SOME redeeming qualities.<br /> [21:24] ZeroStrider - PL: pf<br /> [21:24] cuttlefeffie - EN: shhh yall. have a very small ion(edytowane)<br /> image.jpg<br /> 71.00&#160;KB<br /> [21:24] ZeroStrider - PL: 093 or 1730<br /> [21:24] Dr. Spanko - EN: there is not a single word in that document of 049 that's redeeming<br /> [21:24] Minuteman - ES: ? ? ?<br /> [21:24] Minuteman - ES: 343 neither<br /> <strong>[21:24] Rikjard Regreps - DE: @Dr. Spanko - EN I hereby utter an official warning: You can discuss 049 freely, give reasons why you dont like it, thats no problem. But stop with this &quot;IT SUCKS&quot; and &quot;YOU'RE WRONG BECAUSE I SAY SO&quot; attitude, or there will be consequences.(edytowane)</strong><br /> [21:25] Judas - FR: @Dr. Spanko - EN &quot;and&quot; is very redeeming :v<br /> [21:25] Dr. Spanko - EN: 343, again, and thanks for not listening, creates thwe two paradigms of &quot;uncontainment&quot; and &quot;uncertainty&quot;, which doesn't make it the best damned thing in the universe but it's also leagues better than 049<br /> [21:25] Minuteman - ES: 049's Healing Adventure: Black Plague Tendency<br /> <strong>[21:26] wanna-ping - PL: So what each branch do at Christmas?</strong></p> <p><em>short break in conversation</em></p> <p>[21:31] Dr. Spanko - EN: Ok, I've created a survey, is it okay if I post it here?<br /> [21:31] ThePaperMask - DE: sure<br /> [21:31] Dr. Spanko - EN: <a href="https://goo.gl/forms/kcYNEIuJFINKVv6N2">https://goo.gl/forms/kcYNEIuJFINKVv6N2</a><br /> Google Docs<br /> The 049 Vote<br /> The final settlement of the dispute.<br /> [21:33] ZeroStrider - PL: Majority isn't always right(edytowane)<br /> [21:33] Dr. Spanko - EN: yeah, it is<br /> [21:33] ThePaperMask - DE: +1<br /> [21:33] ZeroStrider - PL: but sure, I'll vote<br /> [21:33] ZeroStrider - PL: Nope, it's not.<br /> [21:33] Dr. Spanko - EN: majority is literally the most favored opinion<br /> [21:33] Dr. Spanko - EN: thats how democracy should work<br /> [21:33] ZeroStrider - PL: Which is most favored<br /> [21:33] ZeroStrider - PL: Not right.<br /> [21:33] Dr. Spanko - EN: The most favored opinion IS righ<br /> [21:34] ZeroStrider - PL: Nope.<br /> [21:34] Judas - FR: @ZeroStrider - PL But Agatha is right :v<br /> [21:34] Miś - PL: @Dr. Spanko - EN Nope<br /> [21:34] Dr. Winde - DE: No it's not.<br /> [21:34] Rikjard Regreps - DE: Guys, stay calm. Majority isnt necessarily allways right, but this is not about ethics, but about wether 049 is a good SCP.(edytowane)<br /> [21:34] ZeroStrider - PL: Sure.<br /> [21:34] ZeroStrider - PL: I voted already.<br /> [21:34] Miś - PL: @Rikjard Regreps - DE Sure Mr Glasses.<br /> [21:35] Rikjard Regreps - DE: Thanks Mr/Ms Anime Girl Santa Teddy. ^^(edytowane)<br /> [21:35] Dr. Spanko - EN: Ok guys, I'm going to post this everywhere else I noted, and then I'm going to come back in 24 hours with the result.<br /> [21:35] ZeroStrider - PL: (Mr)<br /> [21:35] Rikjard Regreps - DE: (thx)<br /> [21:35] ZeroStrider - PL: (np)<br /> [21:35] ZeroStrider - PL: (:D)<br /> [21:35] Miś - PL: @ZeroStrider - PL Shut up, now I'm anime gurl.<br /> [21:35] ZeroStrider - PL: Oh okay.<br /> [21:36] Rikjard Regreps - DE: Allright ^^<br /> [21:36] Miś - PL: (I never watched anime. Am I pretending good anime fan?)<br /> [21:36] Minuteman - ES: A weeb<br /> [21:36] Judas - FR: My opinion : 049 is a SCP.<br /> [21:36] Judas - FR: That's my opinion<br /> [21:37] Minuteman - ES: :thinking:<br /> [21:37] Rikjard Regreps - DE: WROOOOOOOOOOOOONG starts ranting<br /> [21:37] Rikjard Regreps - DE: Just kidding ^^<br /> [21:37] Judas - FR: D:<br /> [21:37] Minuteman - ES: E Q U I V O C A D O<br /> [21:37] Minuteman - ES: Wrong in spanish<br /> [21:37] Dr. Spanko - EN: I agree @Judas - FR<br /> <strong>[21:37] wanna-ping - PL: Thats just mean guys.</strong><br /> [21:38] Judas - FR: What's mean ?<br /> [21:38] Rikjard Regreps - DE: What is?<br /> [21:38] Miś - PL: @Judas - FR Now you must write essay about it.<br /> <strong>[21:38] wanna-ping - PL: All that &quot;wroong&quot; after user was warned for it.</strong><br /> <strong>[21:38] Dr. Spanko - EN: I never even used the word &quot;wrong&quot; afaik, that was someone else</strong><br /> [21:39] Judas - FR: @Miś - PL &quot;The Death of Alto Clef 2 (ft. 049)&quot;<br /> [21:39] wanna-ping - PL: I just feel there is too much dogpilling and hostility towards you @Dr. Spanko - EN .<br /> [21:39] Dr. Spanko - EN: i mean i didn't want to SAY it&#8230;<br /> [21:40] Rikjard Regreps - DE:<br /> Screenshot_2017-12-02-21-39-54.png<br /> 154.50&#160;KB<br /> [21:40] Rikjard Regreps - DE: Just for the record, you did use the word &quot;wrong&quot;.<br /> [21:41] Miś - PL: Grom<br /> Capture_2017-11-11-00-23-23.png<br /> 76.47&#160;KB<br /> Capture_2017-12-01-19-32-59.png<br /> 36.87&#160;KB<br /> [21:41] Minuteman - ES: :^(<br /> [22:43] Dr. Spanko - EN: fairly even, but I think my point is clear<br /> unknown.png<br /> 29.49&#160;KB<br /> [22:43] Dr. Spanko - EN: it's either absolute garbage or no one cares<br /> [22:44] Dr. Spanko - EN: not 24 hours though<br /> [22:45] ZeroStrider - PL: &gt;27% thinks it's good<br /> [22:45] ZeroStrider - PL: &gt;37% thinks it's bad<br /> [22:45] ZeroStrider - PL: that's pretty much even<br /> [22:45] ZeroStrider - PL: You won by a small margin<br /> [22:47] Dr. Spanko - EN: 10%<br /> [22:47] ZeroStrider - PL: Out of 29 voters<br /> [22:48] Dr. Spanko - EN: in fact, you didn't take into account the non-opposed people<br /> [22:48] ZeroStrider - PL: that's not even 3 voters<br /> [22:48] ZeroStrider - PL: anyway<br /> [22:48] ZeroStrider - PL: I think 049 was good<br /> [22:48] ZeroStrider - PL: Now it's a relic of old times<br /> [22:48] ZeroStrider - PL: And it should stay.<br /> [22:55] Dr. Spanko - EN: It wasn't even good at the time<br /> <strong>[22:56] Judas - FR: Stop this please.</strong><br /> [22:57] Judas - FR: This is annoying in the end.<br /> <strong>[22:58] ZeroStrider - PL: Music?</strong><br /> [22:58] ZeroStrider - PL: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEC0gZvMVAI">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEC0gZvMVAI</a><br /> YouTube<br /> LeeandLie<br /> Soul Eater OP2 - &quot;PAPERMOON&quot; | ENGLISH ver | AmaLee &amp; dj-Jo<br /> [22:58] Dr. Spanko - EN: WHOA<br /> unknown.png<br /> 28.58&#160;KB<br /> [22:59] Dr. Spanko - EN: Jesus like 4 votes came in at the same time<br /> [22:59] Dr. Spanko - EN: someone got this from an email?<br /> unknown.png<br /> 803 bytes<br /> <strong>[23:00] Judas - FR: I've said stop</strong><br /> [23:00] Judas - FR: 049 is a skip like another, even if it's the patrimony.<br /> [23:01] Judas - FR: So stop making useless surveys<br /> <strong>[23:05] Dr. Spanko - EN: methinks someone may be jealous that thier opinion isn't majority supported</strong></p> </div> </div> </div> <p>Kick:</p> <div class="collapsible-block"> <div class="collapsible-block-folded"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">+&nbsp;show&nbsp;block</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded" style="display:none"> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded-link"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">–&nbsp;hide&nbsp;block</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-content"> <p><strong>[23:06] wanna-ping - PL: Can we drop the topic for today please?</strong><br /> [23:06] Minuteman - ES: Even if your opinion is supported, no one will delete 049 on the mainsite<br /> [23:07] wanna-ping - PL: Did you guys saw that new essay, this time about tales? <a href="http://www.scp-wiki.net/essays-by-a-hack-writing-tales">http://www.scp-wiki.net/essays-by-a-hack-writing-tales</a><br /> [23:08] Dr. Spanko - EN: And you're incorrect: It's not a skip like another. It's way lower quality. And here's the deal. I will concede it's not the worst scp, I'm sure there are some with lower standards, the issue is it's ratio of celebratedness to it's low quality. 900 or so upvotes, it's in every fucking game, people make stories about having sex with it, etc. It's undeserved. Additionally, I'm not campaigning for its deletion, I'm campaigning for awareness of the issue. It seems like some people are oblivious to its faults.<br /> [23:09] Judas - FR: @Dr. Spanko - EN Could you be less subjective and STOP ?<br /> <strong>[23:10] ZeroStrider - PL: Enough. This topic will only create more saltiness from now on.</strong><br /> <strong>[23:10] ZeroStrider - PL: Really, move on.</strong><br /> [23:10] Judas - FR: Thanks<br /> [23:10] Dr. Spanko - EN: I'm just not appreciating my deprecation at the hands of having a damned opinion. Why do I get shit for not liking something?<br /> <strong>[23:11] wanna-ping - PL: I asked.</strong><br /> <strong>[23:11] wanna-ping - PL: Zero demanded.</strong><br /> <strong>[23:11] wanna-ping - PL: I will kick.</strong><br /> <strong>[23:11] wanna-ping - PL: That was last mention of that topic for today.(edytowane)</strong><br /> <strong>[23:11] wanna-ping - PL: MOVE</strong><br /> <strong>[23:11] wanna-ping - PL: ON</strong><br /> [23:12] wanna-ping - PL: So, only me readed that essay?<br /> [23:12] wanna-ping - PL: Do you guys like to read/ write essays?<br /> [23:13] Judas - FR: I'm a recent member of the french brench so i'll not write essays for now. But I like to read some.<br /> [23:13] wanna-ping - PL: What about translating them?<br /> [23:13] TPS-Geronam - DE: I've written an assay about AIs.<br /> <strong>[23:13] Dr. Spanko - EN: If I'm going to be silenced for defending a point that I'm being attacked about, you can go ahead and do it. It will only make me think less about you.</strong><sup class="footnoteref"><a id="footnoteref-32153-2" href="javascript:;" class="footnoteref" >2</a></sup><br /> [23:14] Judas - FR: @wanna-ping - PL I'm not interested in translating long articles so nope :p<br /> [23:14] Minuteman - ES: Jesus Christ<br /> <strong>[23:14] wanna-ping - PL: That was unnecesarry</strong><br /> <strong>[23:14] wanna-ping - PL: And to anybody else: my order still stands.</strong><br /> [23:14] Minuteman - ES: If you don't like it, it's fine, it's your point of view, we aceppt that, if we like it, stop complaing about it<br /> <strong>[23:15] wanna-ping - PL: I said: my order still stands.</strong><br /> [23:16] Judas - FR: I translate especially short SCPs, and some SCP-J<br /> [23:16] wanna-ping - PL: Yeah, som eessays suck for translation<br /> [23:16] wanna-ping - PL: By some i mean most of them :P<br /> [23:17] TPS-Geronam - DE: Dude, I'm struggling with myself on translating a skip, how the fuck am I supposed to translate something as long as an assay? :D<br /> [23:17] Minuteman - ES: I wrote an essay about how to translate<br /> [23:17] wanna-ping - PL: Nice.<br /> [23:17] wanna-ping - PL: I have one about procedures and one general.<br /> [23:18] Judas - FR: (and translating is my mean to pass the time)<br /> [23:18] Dr. Winde - DE: I translated the CotBG-Hub into german, buddy. It's possible.<br /> <strong>[23:18] JackEvereds: Are you guys seriously so intolerant to the point in which you'll kick someone who doesn't share your opinion?</strong><br /> [23:18] JackEvereds: Really?<br /> [23:18] Minuteman - ES: This guy again?<br /> [23:18] Judas - FR: Seriously ?<br /> [23:18] Minuteman - ES: I'm translating all the sarkicism articles to spanish<br /> [23:19] Judas - FR: :o<br /> [23:19] Rikjard Regreps - DE: @JackEvereds I'll try it nicely one last time. Its not that you're not sharing &quot;our&quot; opinions. Its that you keep on ranting that you dont like SCP-049, despite 3 staff members already asking you to stop.<br /> [23:19] Mafiew - FR: @JackEvereds No. You are warned because your attitude is unsuitable. So you are free to defend your opinion as long as you don't piss on other's.<br /> [23:21] Rikjard Regreps - DE: @JackEvereds We're not &quot;silencing&quot; you. We just want to make it possible for everyone here enjoying chatting with each other. You keep on saying nothing else than &quot;I dont like 049&quot;, which gets old very quickly and is slowly starting to make people angry.<br /> [23:25] JackEvereds: My attitude is 100% acceptable, I'm not taken a tone of voice in any negative fashion, that's you interpretation of the matter. I'm not &quot;only&quot; saying 049 is bad, I'm continuing the ongoing arguement, and I see not being able to give my side as silencing. If the people of this chat get angry over a stupid piece of text, that's their perogative. I need a break from this, it's tiring.<br /> [23:25] Rikjard Regreps - DE: Enjoy your ban.<br /> [23:25] TPS-Geronam - DE: @KIRA Alright baby girl, let's see if you work properly.<br /> [23:26] wanna-ping - PL: I did not recall withdrawing my order to stop discussion about that topic.<br /> [23:26] JackEvereds: I don't want to discuss this anymore.<br /> [23:26] JackEvereds: Please stop berating me for it<br /> [23:26] wanna-ping - PL: So fucking dont.<br /> [23:26] wanna-ping - PL: Lets give our first Bot warm welcome!<br /> [23:27] JackEvereds: Woo!<br /> [23:27] (not telling sorry) - EN: whats going on<br /> [23:27] JackEvereds: it's over</p> </div> </div> </div> <p>Later we had semi normal conversation</p> <p><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Will edit that post shortly to bold revelant parts</span></p> <div class="footnotes-footer"> <div class="title">Footnotes</div> <div class="footnote-footer" id="footnote-32153-1"><a href="javascript:;" >1</a>. I missed that message - wanna</div> <div class="footnote-footer" id="footnote-32153-2"><a href="javascript:;" >2</a>. Kickeed here - wanna</div> </div> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-4396830#post-3643813</guid>
				<title>Chat: Pepsi - EN@Bepsei#4629: Re: Chat: Pepsi - EN@Bepsei#4629</title>
				<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-4396830/chat:pepsi-en-bepsei-4629#post-3643813</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 17:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>wanna-amigo</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2364809</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Fine by me.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-4396830#post-3643518</guid>
				<title>Chat: Pepsi - EN@Bepsei#4629: Re: Chat: Pepsi - EN@Bepsei#4629</title>
				<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-4396830/chat:pepsi-en-bepsei-4629#post-3643518</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 07:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Dr_Grom</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2026083</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>It is a criminal offense. I don't know the law in France but I know that the law in Germany regarding such things is zero-tolerance. Therefore the emergency-ban. It can even be prosecuted by German law enforcement outside of Germany. In fact, it is holocaust-denial which - if you get a judge who is not familiar with the concept of memes - could easily result in five years of prison, should he set foot to Germany, or should law enforcement decide to demand extradition. This offense may even be on a higher level than swastikas - if a judge takes it serious. He has been pinged and clearly warned yesterday morning, hours before he put it up again. I could also have banned him immediately regarding the warning before. Not looking after his pings is his problem, I'm not going to make it mine. I know it's a joke, but I'm not going to take a risk; law enforcement is full of old farts who have no clue about the internet and memes.</p> <p>I'd say we go with 24 h from yesterday 18:16&#160;o'clock and tell him why he was banned when he is being unbanned.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-4396830#post-3643142</guid>
				<title>Chat: Pepsi - EN@Bepsei#4629: Re: Chat: Pepsi - EN@Bepsei#4629</title>
				<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-4396830/chat:pepsi-en-bepsei-4629#post-3643142</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 19:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>wanna-amigo</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2364809</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <blockquote> <p>I'm unsure whether we should go with the standard intervall (24h) or longer for the extent of the offense.</p> </blockquote> <p>Well, user is banned right now, so i guess it's 24 hours ban? (Hard Kick) If not then why ban still stands?</p> <p>As for user i belive they have no idea they did something bad: afaik that's common &quot;meme&quot; in some places. 5 minutes wait time after public demand may be too harsh, cause user probably was too busy to saw that.</p> <p>In my opinion we should unban that user, write DM about issue and move to 24h ban on next offense.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-4396830#post-3643099</guid>
				<title>Chat: Pepsi - EN@Bepsei#4629: Chat: Pepsi - EN@Bepsei#4629</title>
				<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-4396830/chat:pepsi-en-bepsei-4629#post-3643099</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 17:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Dr_Grom</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2026083</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>The Discord user Pepsi - EN@Bepsei#4629 has had a status claiming &quot;Hitler didn't do anything wrong&quot; this morning (CET). As this is a criminal offense in some countries and in my opinion a strong violation of Rule #1, I wanted to warn the user this morning but they changed it beforehand, so I warned the user at 10:08 not to use this status again.</p> <p>Then this evening, I saw the user again with this status, so I gave them five minutes to change it. They didn't so I emergency-banned them. A screenshot of the offense is in #staff-log.</p> <p>This status is a criminal offense in Germany and also in other countries I asume. Therefore I emergency-banned instead of kicking them.</p> <p>I'm unsure whether we should go with the standard intervall (24h) or longer for the extent of the offense.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>