<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Discord: sepiafishie</title>
		<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-6607846/discord:sepiafishie</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Discord: sepiafishie&quot;</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:35:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-6607846#post-3887662</guid>
				<title>Re: Discord: sepiafishie</title>
				<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-6607846/discord:sepiafishie#post-3887662</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 13:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Nederbird</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2854162</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Put together, the evidence clearly speaks in her disfavour. While I think that it is legitimate to compare the Western far right to Islamic extremist (which is pretty much the Mideastern far right), her implied allegations of others being nazi, and her condoning of unprovoked violence (as in, not being attacked first) against far-rightists, are clearly over the line and should have been acted upon earlier. Why it wasn't is beyond me, though I reckon that the matter was unceremoniously closed down after Spaces departed. That was wrong, as Spaces was evidently not the only offender. Sepia's offences effectively constitute libel and sedition under Swedish law, and I'd hazard to guess that also holds true for German and British law. That in itself, deserves a warning on its own right.</p> <p>The fact that she refuses to acknowledge opposing points is problematic in and of itself. However, since Rik's discussion with her happened off-server, and despite her acting like a dick in it, it's not severe enough for us to really do anything about it except take it as a warning sign.</p> <p>I myself demanded that sepia stop with that behaviour at the last instance, as it had become obvious that it was long overdue. There were no logs of warnings to her before, but I feel that that may indeed be in order soon. I logged mine action in the staff_log on the Discord server for those of you who are interested.</p> <p>While her slashfic gushing of CotBG-Sarkic characters can be annoying, I don't see that as enough to merit disciplinary action. Usually, she has done that when Sarkicism or CotBG has been discussed. As she posts no pics when doing that, thus not annoyingly taking up screen space, I would not regard the odd comment from her as shitposting. When it comes to cuttlefish, I really do not mind, on the contrary, I think it has a calming effect (cute animals always do), and there is definitely no need for disciplinary action on those grounds. Consider also that, lately, she has been posting far fewer cuttlefish pics, and has generally been far less active on the server, if you find the gushing and cuttlefish that annoying.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-6607846#post-3886642</guid>
				<title>Re: Discord: sepiafishie</title>
				<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-6607846/discord:sepiafishie#post-3886642</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 17:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Dr_Grom</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2026083</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I agree that her behavior back then was inacceptable.</p> <p>Though since some time she focusses on cuttlefish and fem-CotBG, in which I see no direct rule breaking. Haven't seen her taking part in an argument since (or I missed it). It is discussable though if that constant fem-CotBG commenting, especially on totally unrelated topics, can be seen as rule-breaking shitposting. I have no problem with cuttlefish or other animals though.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-6607846#post-3886575</guid>
				<title>Discord: sepiafishie</title>
				<link>http://o5command-int.wikidot.com/forum/t-6607846/discord:sepiafishie#post-3886575</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 15:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Rikjard Regreps</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>2750540</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>I announced it a while ago, here it is: Screenshots of the most egregious instances of sepiafishie being aggressive and someone whos behavior should have lead to administrative action a while ago.</p> <div class="collapsible-block"> <div class="collapsible-block-folded"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">Instances&nbsp;of&nbsp;sepiafishie&nbsp;insulting&nbsp;someone&nbsp;she&nbsp;disagreed&nbsp;with</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded" style="display:none"> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded-link"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">Close</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-content"> <p>Druing a discussion about wether or not the word &quot;trap&quot; was insulting (MIND YOU, that first, many of our members aren't native speakers and secondly, the discussion started because of a picture of a heterosexual, cisgendered man who dressed up as woman and the Admiral Ackbar-&quot;Its a trap!&quot;-meme afterwards), sepia called those who didnt exactly agree with wether it was offensive <em>in this instance</em> a dick. Twice.</p> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/insulting%20someone%20who%20disagrees%2001.png" alt="insulting%20someone%20who%20disagrees%2001.png" class="image" /></div> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/insulting%20someone%20who%20disagrees%2002.png" alt="insulting%20someone%20who%20disagrees%2002.png" class="image" /></div> <p>With this the discussion excalated even more, resulting in one of our staff members, Zero Strider, leaving and as of yet not returning.</p> </div> </div> </div> <div class="collapsible-block"> <div class="collapsible-block-folded"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">Comparing&nbsp;the&nbsp;Right&nbsp;to&nbsp;islamic&nbsp;extremism</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded" style="display:none"> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded-link"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">Close</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-content"> <p>No matter ones own position on the political spectrum, it is not okay to compare the right to actual terrorists.</p> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/comparing%20right%20wing%20to%20islamic%20extremism%2001.png" alt="comparing%20right%20wing%20to%20islamic%20extremism%2001.png" class="image" /></div> </div> </div> </div> <div class="collapsible-block"> <div class="collapsible-block-folded"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">Arguing&nbsp;that&nbsp;assault&nbsp;is&nbsp;self-defense</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded" style="display:none"> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded-link"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">Close</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-content"> <p>In thsi discussion sepiafishie argued that assaulting nazis is self-defense. It goes without saying, assaulting anyone can never be self-defense.</p> <p>Also in this discussion, she seems not to take the people shes discussing with serious.</p> <p>And also, she at one point argues that people who disagree with her only do so because they're not part of a group Nazis would threaten - which is arrogant and which I personally find insulting, especially since in this context I belong to the same &quot;group&quot;.</p> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/assault%20is%20self%20defense%2000.png" alt="assault%20is%20self%20defense%2000.png" class="image" /></div> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/assault%20is%20self%20defense%2001.png" alt="assault%20is%20self%20defense%2001.png" class="image" /></div> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/assault%20is%20self%20defense%2002.png" alt="assault%20is%20self%20defense%2002.png" class="image" /></div> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/aussault%20is%20self%20defense%2003.png" alt="aussault%20is%20self%20defense%2003.png" class="image" /></div> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/assault%20is%20self%20defense%2004.png" alt="assault%20is%20self%20defense%2004.png" class="image" /></div> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/assault%20is%20self%20defense%2005.png" alt="assault%20is%20self%20defense%2005.png" class="image" /></div> <p>As can be seen in the last screenshot, she invited people who wanted to continue the discussion to send her PMs. Following this the &quot;sockpuppeting&quot;-incident with another User (who was recently banned for that incident and other reasons) happened. Just to clarify: She invited people to message her, blocked one who did, and was then angry that he created another account to continue.</p> </div> </div> </div> <div class="collapsible-block"> <div class="collapsible-block-folded"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">My&nbsp;(Rik&nbsp;Regreps)&nbsp;own&nbsp;discussion&nbsp;with&nbsp;her</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded" style="display:none"> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded-link"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">Close</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-content"> <p>Because of her invitation to continue the discussion, I decided to message her after I saw the discussion. I will share the entire discussion per screenshots, and while it did not happen directly on the INT-server, I find it nevertheless important to consider. Especially since I have never written PMs with Sepiafishie before or after this, meaning that we really dont have any other relation than me being a staff member on the Discord and her being a user there.</p> <p>In this discussion Sepiafishie showed signs of not taking me serious, used scrrenshots (possibly memes?) that had the words &quot;you imbecile. you moron&quot; in them, and in the end felt unsettled because I simply wanted her to think again about her <em>arguing that assaulting anyone can be self-defense</em>.</p> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/PM-discussion%2001.png" alt="PM-discussion%2001.png" class="image" /></div> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/PM-discussion%2002.png" alt="PM-discussion%2002.png" class="image" /></div> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/PM-discussion%2003.png" alt="PM-discussion%2003.png" class="image" /></div> <p>Now that you have seen this discussion, here's another reason why I decided to shar the entire conversation. Sepia accused me of sockpuppeting as well during the previously mentioned &quot;sockpuppeting&quot;-incident. She wasn't sure if it was me or the other user who DM'd her, so she accused both of us. Mind you, neither had she banned me, nor had I during the discussion reacted aggressively or threatening at any point, yet she went to Grom (the admin of the german branch where I'm a staff-member, mind you) and said that she believes I'm sockpuppeting her.</p> </div> </div> </div> <div class="collapsible-block"> <div class="collapsible-block-folded"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">Accusing&nbsp;someone&nbsp;of&nbsp;being&nbsp;a&nbsp;nazi</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded" style="display:none"> <div class="collapsible-block-unfolded-link"><a class="collapsible-block-link" href="javascript:;">Close</a></div> <div class="collapsible-block-content"> <p>I mean, its not explicit, but not exactly subtle either.</p> <div class="image-container aligncenter"><img src="http://o5command-int.wdfiles.com/local--files/forum%3Athread/accusing%20someone%20of%20being%20a%20nazi.png" alt="accusing%20someone%20of%20being%20a%20nazi.png" class="image" /></div> </div> </div> </div> <p>I hope all of that shows that we should have an eye on sepiafishie and show her <strong>much</strong> less leniency the next time she violates rule #1. By which I mean at least a kick. It was demanded she stopped being aggressive/insulting multiple times already.</p> <p>Also, her constantly shitposting about being hot for cultists and cuttelfish has proven to annoy quite a number of our users. Anyone volunteers to tell her to tone that down?</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>