Recent Forum Posts
From categories:
page 1123...next »

The results so far:

  1. 5
  2. 4
  3. 0
  4. 0

I will apply the result tomorrow. You can still vote.

Re: Unofficial Branch Box by Dr_GromDr_Grom, 16 Feb 2018 20:22

I vote 1. I don't think we need more boxes and it is obvious that these are unofficial branches.

Re: Unofficial Branch Box by Dr_GromDr_Grom, 13 Feb 2018 07:28

I find the 2. version better.

Re: Unofficial Branch Box by TPS-GeronamTPS-Geronam, 12 Feb 2018 22:51

Despite my opinion on discord i want to vote on 2 opinion now. More practical.

Re: Unofficial Branch Box by wanna-amigowanna-amigo, 12 Feb 2018 20:04

Option 1, absolutely.


-LofB

Re: Unofficial Branch Box by LofBLofB, 12 Feb 2018 13:57

1. Nuff said

Re: Unofficial Branch Box by Dr OreDr Ore, 12 Feb 2018 08:25

I vote 1.

This'll be a great way to draw attention to our unofficial branches and will hopefully earn them some more traffic, if not members.

Re: Unofficial Branch Box by NederbirdNederbird, 12 Feb 2018 07:44

Added a link to the separate-box method. A link can be added manually to the official-branch-box.

Re: Unofficial Branch Box by Dr_GromDr_Grom, 12 Feb 2018 07:41

I think a separate box would be best just to differentiate between the two categories more clearly.


Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!

Re: Unofficial Branch Box by RogetRoget, 12 Feb 2018 03:41

1. In the branch box


I know it would make things terribly cluttered if you made an admin list for the unofficial branches, but what about a small link to the ambassadors hub, so anyone could find the admins by clicking on it?

Re: Unofficial Branch Box by SilvacrestSilvacrest, 11 Feb 2018 22:41

I hereby propose to put a box containing a list of the Unofficial Branches on the main page. I have prepared two options: In the branch-list on the bottom or as a separate box.

There is a mock-up of both versions in this sandbox.

It is possible to embedd this box on your wiki if you want, instructions are here.

Let's vote:

  1. In the branch box
  2. In a separate box
  3. Not like this
  4. Not at all
  5. I need to talk about this first

Anyway feedback for visual enhancement is highly recommended.

Unofficial Branch Box by Dr_GromDr_Grom, 11 Feb 2018 22:19

Perma from me. But i will be fine with 3 years as well, but perma will be better.

The users Gott Azzy@Gott Azzy#1516 alias Gott Azzy der zweite#4149, @NOOBI#3101 and TheScientist@GoF*ckYourself#5877 alias FishyBishy#4940 have been banned after the following incident:

On the 25.01.2018 Azzy and Noobi have entered the INT's Discord and started trolling and being offensive to other users, especially certain German staff members. Both have been banned from DE's Discord after a similar incident in December. They were banned on INT and joined several other branches Discords to continue there, where they where banned immediately in most cases.

There is proof that they where invited to the servers by TheScientist.
He also seems to have a habit of choosing provoking nicknames (which got him a warning on DE the same day), like "GoF*ckYourself", something with "ACAB" in it, "Bolshewik!", "SuicideIsHealthy" (which triggered a panic attack in one of our users who is sensitive to that matter) etc.

All three have been banned for 3 years on DE, as we do not think they are going to be mature enough for our community soon.

How long should they be banned? To me it seems as if Azzy was the one who causes all the trouble while Noobi and Scientist do as he bids.

The results so far:

  1. Are they INT-staff (like the Review Team)? — Y:1/N:6/?:0
    • If they are, will new members that are not already INT-staff have to be approved by the Primary Contact of their branch? — Y:3/N:0/?:4
    • If not, are they under supervision of INT-staff? — Y:6/N:0/?:1
      • Are they a part of INT at all? — Y:3/N:1/?:3
    • Do they get access to #staff_discussion on Discord? — Y:2/N:4/?:1
    • May they take part in discussions (not voting)? — Y:2/N:0/?:1/Tech-stuff:4
  2. Do they get one or more Team Captains? — Y:7/N:0/?:0
    • If they are not staff, does the TC have to be INT-staff? — Y:1/N:2/?:4
  3. Do they get a section in the INT-O5-Wiki or do they have to create an own Wiki? — Section:7/Own Wiki:0/?:0
  4. Do they get a public and a non-public channel in INT's Discord like the RT? — Y:7/N:0/?:0
    • Do they also get a fancy color to be easier to identify? — Y:7/N:0/?:0
Re: Creation of a Tech Team by Dr_GromDr_Grom, 12 Jan 2018 23:08

Are they INT-staff (like the Review Team)? No, but they should have similar status.

If they are, will new members that are not already INT-staff have to be approved by the Primary Contact of their branch?

Something like this will probably have to be done to ensure credibility.

If not, are they under supervision of INT-staff?

They should be supervised but for big projects a level of autonomy would be essential.

Are they a part of INT at all?

Yes.

Do they get access to #staff_discussion on Discord?

Definitely, I would make a channel for them like review has too.

May they take part in discussions (not voting)?

Definitely.

Do they get one or more Team Captains?

One should be sufficient for overall operations, perhaps we could designate sub captains for big projects when the time comes.

Do they get a section in the INT-O5-Wiki or do they have to create an own Wiki?

A section of the existing site seems more practical.

Do they get a public and a non-public channel in INT's Discord like the RT?

Why not?

Do they also get a fancy color to be easier to identify?

Nothing wrong with a little mark of status.


Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!

Re: Creation of a Tech Team by RogetRoget, 12 Jan 2018 16:04
page 1123...next »
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License